If you do not see a green border, click here insights.clinicalinnovations.com/September2004.htm
.


What is the Safe Level for Vacuum?

Introduction

In the United States, vacuum is used more than twice as often forceps in operative assisted vaginal delivery. The principle of the vacuum is based on the adherence of the cup to the fetal scalp. This adherence is produced by the increasing negative pressure, which creates an artificial caput of edematous scalp under the cup. When traction is exerted, the cup and the caput act as a unit and assist the movement of the fetus through the birth canal. However, if the traction force equals or overcomes the adherence force of the vacuum a pop-off occurs, which is associated with a higher incidence of fetal scalp injuries.


Dr. James Simpson, often credited as the first practitioner to report his experience using a “suction tractor” to assist a prolonged labor, once stated: “if we could fix upon the exposed portion of the fetal scalp the suctorial disc of a limpet or cuttle-fish with the usual force with which they adhere to the sea rocks to which they are attached, we should have a power sufficient to enable us to apply by them the necessary amount of extractive force”.

What is the recommended vacuum level that should be obtained prior to conducting a vacuum delivery?

The recommended operating level of vacuum for vacuum-assisted delivery is between 450-600mmHg. Not all gauges on the pumps used today are standardized to the same units, but the conversion chart below can be used to convert frequently used units.

kPa

mmHg

kg/cm2

Hg

H2O

lb/in2

bar

13

100

0.13

3.9

134

1.9

0.13

27

200

0.27

7.9

268

3.9

0.26

40

300

0.41

11.8

402

5.8

0.39

53

400

0.54

15.7

536

7.7

0.53

67

500

0.68

19.7

670

9.7

0.66

80

600

0.82

23.6

804

11.6

0.79

93

700

0.95

27.0

938

13.5

0.92

101

760

1.03

29.9

1018

14.7

1.00

Courtesy of A. Vacca (Handbook of Vacuum Delivery, 2003)

In 1962, Kelly and Mishell published an article in the Journal of Surgery, Gynecology, and Obstetrics detailing their experience with the vacuum in 202 cases. They reported that with a vacuum level of 0.6kg/cm2 (500mmHg) a limit of 25-30 pounds of tractive force could be applied prior to a detachment. With a vacuum level of 0.7kg/cm2 (550mmHg) a limit of 30-35 pounds was seen, and at a level of 0.8kg/cm2 (600mmHg) a limit of 35-45 pounds was observed. It was these types of reports that helped to create the hypothesized “safe range” of vacuum.

Interestingly, the range of 450-600mmHg was arbitrarily determined after a review of several observational studies published in the literature in the early 1960’s. The original description by Tage Malmstrom (1954) of the use of his ‘revolutionary device’, the vacuum extractor, recommended obtaining a level of 0.8kg/cm2 (600mmHg) prior to applying any tractive force.

Is there any danger to not being in the recommended zone of 450-600mmHg?

The literature has made clear that lower levels of vacuum (e.g. 450mmHg or less) lead to a greater number of sudden detachments (pop-offs), which may increase the incidence of scalp trauma and serious complications such as subgaleal and intracranial hemorrhages. However, there have been no reported studies showing that a ‘higher level’ of vacuum (e.g. 600mmHg and higher) leads to greater injuries. Thus, it is most physicians’ practice to induce the vacuum to the highest level (top of the green or 600mmHg). In fact, a review of the literature revealed that greater than 90% of the reported trials on vacuum delivery devices, listing the vacuum level, reported using 600mmHg.

Furthermore, it should be remembered that atmospheric pressure is 760mmHg at sea level and this pressure decreases with increasing elevation. Thus, with a perfectly designed vacuum pump, the maximum amount of pressure that could be obtained is 760mmHg (at sea level). However, there is no product on the market that is ‘perfect’ and thus most devices cannot exceed 700mmHg no matter how long they are pumped. Regardless, it is important to stress that no evidence exists to show that higher levels of vacuum are associated with an increased rate of fetal scalp injury. It is the sudden detachments that occur—more often at the lower vacuum range—that lead to higher incidences of fetal injuries, not the vacuum level itself.

Are all gauges accurate?

Consensus opinion holds that that majority of fetal scalp or intracranial injuries are most likely due to incorrect placement of the cup on the fetal head. However, the FDA database of injuries asserts that gauge inaccuracy has lead to fetal injury and even death. A study reported at the 2004 Annual ACOG Meeting by Dr. Victor Vines (Medical City Dallas Hospital, Dallas, Texas) showed that almost half of all ‘reusable’ pumps were inaccurate. Dr. Vines showed that the Bourdon gauges, used on all vacuum devices except for Clinical Innovations Kiwi PalmPump, were easily made inaccurate when exposed to any impact or vibration—which often occurs during cleaning and storage of these pumps. In addition, the Bourdon gauges are subject to impact during shipping (even the single-use vacuums) which could make them less accurate. The single-use Kiwi PalmPump, with a tire-gauge approach, appears to not be as prone to the error introduced by the vibration and shock of storing and shipping.


Specific to the Kiwi PalmPump

Of note, when the vacuum is obtained with the PalmPump, an audible click can be appreciated with each pump. This click is a valve releasing the pressure from within the cup, after several pumps (approximately 22-25) the audible click will disappear, showing that no more vacuum can be obtained. Thus, a practitioner can pump the PalmPump as much as he/she wants, but will be hard pressed to obtain a vacuum greater than approximately 700mmHg—which appears to be a safe level. However, since it is the standard of care to obtain 450-600mmHg, this is the advice we continue to recommend.

To claim your prize, email insights@clinicalinnovations.com with the address where you would like delivery.
This Month's Winners
 Laura Burgess, Canandaigua, NY
 Stephen Jones, Florence, SC
 Jane Purdy, Anderson, IN
 Prize: Handbook of Vacuum Extraction by Aldo Vacca

Add a Subscriber
If you have a friend or colleague practicing in the OB/GYN specialty and think they may appreciate this information, send their information to: insights@clinicalinnovations.com
Cancel Subscription
To cancel your subscription and stop receiving e-mails, simply reply to this e-mail with cancel in the subject.

Innovative Insights Archive

.
we make it...informative